<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 MUST have gadgets in 1st half of 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007</link>
	<description>Anything and everything portable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:40:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marlene</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007/comment-page-1#comment-33640</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-33640</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Marlene...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Marlene&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hutcherson</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007/comment-page-1#comment-20335</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hutcherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-20335</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else worry that the Nano 4 feels too light and is so thin that it will easily break ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else worry that the Nano 4 feels too light and is so thin that it will easily break ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CodeIdol</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007/comment-page-1#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeIdol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Technology is a great thing, I own a IBM laptop, a SLR Digital camera, and a Wii. If people did not buy technology, then technology companies would not exist and advancements in technology would be going no where, or just really slow. So it&#039;s a good thing that the people that can afford to buy the newest technology, do. So to Amazing, sure they make money off of us who buy their stuff, but we work for a living to buy those kinds of things. Am I just not gonna buy a car, because it makes car companies richer. If everyone thought like that then they would not have the money, resources, or demand to produce the kinds of cars we have today and we all might be driving around in a horse and buggy or the Ford Model T right now. All because you don&#039;t want to make someone who works for a living a little richer. You can apply that to anything you use toady, not just cars. ex. TV, phone, refrigerator (lets all build our own ice boxes like in the old days so we don&#039;t make anyone richer)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology is a great thing, I own a IBM laptop, a SLR Digital camera, and a Wii. If people did not buy technology, then technology companies would not exist and advancements in technology would be going no where, or just really slow. So it&#8217;s a good thing that the people that can afford to buy the newest technology, do. So to Amazing, sure they make money off of us who buy their stuff, but we work for a living to buy those kinds of things. Am I just not gonna buy a car, because it makes car companies richer. If everyone thought like that then they would not have the money, resources, or demand to produce the kinds of cars we have today and we all might be driving around in a horse and buggy or the Ford Model T right now. All because you don&#8217;t want to make someone who works for a living a little richer. You can apply that to anything you use toady, not just cars. ex. TV, phone, refrigerator (lets all build our own ice boxes like in the old days so we don&#8217;t make anyone richer)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CodeIdol</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007/comment-page-1#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeIdol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t own a single one of them. Don&#039;t want any of them. Too many gadgets as it is. Only keeps making the companies that produce them rich and the purchaser poor. NO thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t own a single one of them. Don&#8217;t want any of them. Too many gadgets as it is. Only keeps making the companies that produce them rich and the purchaser poor. NO thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007/comment-page-1#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Apple TV? At least you didn&#039;t put the iPhone on your list...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple TV? At least you didn&#8217;t put the iPhone on your list&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
