<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 MUST have gadgets in 1st half of 2007</title>
	<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007</link>
	<description>Anything and everything portable</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CodeIdol</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeIdol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Technology is a great thing, I own a IBM laptop, a SLR Digital camera, and a Wii. If people did not buy technology, then technology companies would not exist and advancements in technology would be going no where, or just really slow. So it's a good thing that the people that can afford to buy the newest technology, do. So to Amazing, sure they make money off of us who buy their stuff, but we work for a living to buy those kinds of things. Am I just not gonna buy a car, because it makes car companies richer. If everyone thought like that then they would not have the money, resources, or demand to produce the kinds of cars we have today and we all might be driving around in a horse and buggy or the Ford Model T right now. All because you don't want to make someone who works for a living a little richer. You can apply that to anything you use toady, not just cars. ex. TV, phone, refrigerator (lets all build our own ice boxes like in the old days so we don't make anyone richer)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology is a great thing, I own a IBM laptop, a SLR Digital camera, and a Wii. If people did not buy technology, then technology companies would not exist and advancements in technology would be going no where, or just really slow. So it&#8217;s a good thing that the people that can afford to buy the newest technology, do. So to Amazing, sure they make money off of us who buy their stuff, but we work for a living to buy those kinds of things. Am I just not gonna buy a car, because it makes car companies richer. If everyone thought like that then they would not have the money, resources, or demand to produce the kinds of cars we have today and we all might be driving around in a horse and buggy or the Ford Model T right now. All because you don&#8217;t want to make someone who works for a living a little richer. You can apply that to anything you use toady, not just cars. ex. TV, phone, refrigerator (lets all build our own ice boxes like in the old days so we don&#8217;t make anyone richer)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CodeIdol</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeIdol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Don't own a single one of them. Don't want any of them. Too many gadgets as it is. Only keeps making the companies that produce them rich and the purchaser poor. NO thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t own a single one of them. Don&#8217;t want any of them. Too many gadgets as it is. Only keeps making the companies that produce them rich and the purchaser poor. NO thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Apple TV? At least you didn't put the iPhone on your list...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple TV? At least you didn&#8217;t put the iPhone on your list&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topgadget.us</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>topgadget.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-229</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top 5 MUST have gadgets in 1st half of 2007...&lt;/strong&gt;

A good look at this year's MUST have gadgets, how many of of the top 5 gadgets do you own?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top 5 MUST have gadgets in 1st half of 2007&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A good look at this year&#8217;s MUST have gadgets, how many of of the top 5 gadgets do you own?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtendler</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>rtendler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you are not aware of the new Leica.
It beats the Nikon hands down for two reasons:

1) 35mm-420mm zoom in one lens.  No need to carry additional lenses.

2) image stabilization</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you are not aware of the new Leica.<br />
It beats the Nikon hands down for two reasons:</p>
<p>1) 35mm-420mm zoom in one lens.  No need to carry additional lenses.</p>
<p>2) image stabilization</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: update dubai</title>
		<link>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>update dubai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 03:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.portablegadget.com/notebook/top-5-must-have-gadgets-in-1st-half-of-2007#comment-223</guid>
		<description>looks like a very slow year.

I dont have any of these "hot" new items. But I have cool old alternatives for 4 of them :)

5. Sony cyber-shot 5.1 about 4 yeras old and working great
4. Dell 6400 works well and I have it configured dual boot for linux
3. Ipod Gen 2 with 60GB still working got it the same year ad the camera
2. Well my laptop has a video port and combined with VLC player not only does it play everything without restrictions. Also it's on the local network and I can stream media from my desktop PC.
1. well cannot argue with a Wii</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like a very slow year.</p>
<p>I dont have any of these &#8220;hot&#8221; new items. But I have cool old alternatives for 4 of them <img src='http://www.portablegadget.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>5. Sony cyber-shot 5.1 about 4 yeras old and working great<br />
4. Dell 6400 works well and I have it configured dual boot for linux<br />
3. Ipod Gen 2 with 60GB still working got it the same year ad the camera<br />
2. Well my laptop has a video port and combined with VLC player not only does it play everything without restrictions. Also it&#8217;s on the local network and I can stream media from my desktop PC.<br />
1. well cannot argue with a Wii</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
